dariush Forum Elite

Topics: 20 Posts: 356
| | 05/28/04 - 05:07 AM  
 
   
 
|   #1 |
hi there, i wonder if anyone knows why these decrease the Repolarization time. i know they work on Inactive Na channels,but what does it have to do with repolarization ?? :roll:
___________________ Allah (God) is watching over us...
|
| ghizou Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 9
| | 06/05/04 - 04:21 PM  
 
   
 
|   #2 |
class1B anti arrythmics decrease action potential duration due to block of the slow NA+ " window" currents
|
| dariush Forum Elite

Topics: 20 Posts: 356
| | 06/06/04 - 05:24 AM  
 
   
 
|   #3 |
what do you mean by "window" current, is that the "funny" currents in the SA that generate the AP? if that is so, how would that effect the REPOLARIZATION ? give me the clue <:help:>
___________________ Allah (God) is watching over us...
|
| ghizou Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 9
| | 06/08/04 - 04:45 PM  
 
   
 
|   #4 |
no, it's simple, we have fast na+ channel that lead to depolarization, but at resting mb, we have normal passive na+ leak from extracell to intracell trought slow channel, than if we block this channel, the repolarisation will be faster leading to decrease of action potential duration. i think it help you to understand.
|
| dariush Forum Elite

Topics: 20 Posts: 356
| | 06/09/04 - 06:13 AM  
 
   
 
|   #5 |
thanx, now i got it !
___________________ Allah (God) is watching over us...
|
|
| |
| | | | | |