GMOB Forum Elite
Topics: 22 Posts: 250
| | 09/23/08 - 06:17 AM  
 
|   #1 |
Hi everyone, I thought I would share some advice given to me by 3 M.D.s who are all part of their respective hospitals selection committee: According to them, it is best to waive your LOR if you can. They all agreed that the letter carries more weight. I particularly have "trust issues" and do not feel comfortable doing so, lol...But just thought I would share with you. Best of lucks this match season!!!
|
| dara_bc2002 Forum Elite

Topics: 11 Posts: 281
| | 09/23/08 - 11:37 PM  
 
|   #2 |
IF the letter was sent directly to ERAS ..it pretty much doesn't matter if you waived or not because you still can't see the letter . So you might as well waive it . The only issue I have with waiving it ..is that here we are mostly IMGs and we can't be 100 % sure that we will match this year . In case - God forbid ! - someone doesn't match , ERAS will return those LoRs that were NOT waived , and destroy the waived LoRs ..so in a consequent match they can't be used again . Imagine how one would feel to lose his only US LoRs for exemple and try to obtain them all over again for the next year . It's tough .
|
| hitesh .
Topics: 64 Posts: 1,087
| | 09/24/08 - 04:13 AM  
 
|   #3 |
Here's a thought...Even if you dont waive the LoRs , wouldn't you need updated LoRs for the next match season. LoRs should ideally be recent.
___________________ 13/33
|
| dara_bc2002 Forum Elite

Topics: 11 Posts: 281
| | 09/24/08 - 05:50 AM  
 
|   #4 |
It should be ..ideally ... But if you live abroad and the attendings in the US ... It's veeeeery hard to get them to do that ....it's hard the first time , let alone a year later ...
Edited by dara_bc2002 on 09/24/08 - 07:39 AM
|
| arlete Forum Fanatic

Topics: 50 Posts: 3,570
| | 09/24/08 - 07:34 AM  
 
|   #5 |
I think it all depends on how competitive the program is. The stronger the candidates, the more demanding the PD will be. So I heard a PD say that a strong step 3 score strenghtens the application, but he couldn't care less about the LORs being waived or not. I heard people telling they talked to other PDs that said the opposite (and I believe them). So, if one didn't send the LORs yet (or didn't even request them), I agree, waive them. I waived all of mine. But if you didn't do it for one reason or another, it's not a big deal. If someone considers your application weaker because the LORs were not waived, frankly, he's just looking for an excuse to choose another candidate over you. I doubt any PD tells the PC: we won't interview the people with non-waived LORs.
___________________ Now it's on God's hands. I've done my best!
|
| GMOB Forum Elite
Topics: 22 Posts: 250
| | 09/24/08 - 04:11 PM  
 
|   #6 |
Hi everyone, I agree with Arlete and hitesh. Waiving it's ideal, but it's not that big of a deal. dara_bc, my plan B in case I dont match this year, is that i'm also asking for letters with next year's date but they will not say I waived my right. The md's that I work with all agree that a waived letter is "PERCEIVED" a little bit stronger, than a non-waived one. I think this is an interesting discussion, and this is precisely why I posted this. Good Luck!
|
| arlete Forum Fanatic

Topics: 50 Posts: 3,570
| | 09/24/08 - 06:20 PM  
 
|   #7 |
My personal experience: a person who's eager to help you for this match will certainly help you one year from now.
___________________ Now it's on God's hands. I've done my best!
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | |