Yulik08
Forum Newbie
Topics: 1
Posts: 9
|
q attached. I`m thinking here is answer linkage disqulubrium. Any other answers?
Attached Files:
P1040078.JPG (102 KB, 53 downloads)
|
| Yulik08
Forum Newbie
Topics: 1
Posts: 9
|
how come - no answers yet? Guys, hello???
|
| Ig F
Forum Elite
Topics: 3
Posts: 436
|
seems A to me....since no other explanation fits.....can you please explain?
___________________
i m not perfect but i wanna get close to it......
|
| Jackofknives
Ipwnpoker.com
Topics: 91
Posts: 718
|
Seems like B to me.
Not A because 0.2 * (1-0.2) = 0.16
Certainly not somatic mutation and variable expressivity.
___________________
There are many things in this world that can’t be changed no matter how hard you try. That’s why you must not hesitate when the time comes where you have to give it all you’ve got.
|
| Yulik08
Forum Newbie
Topics: 1
Posts: 9
|
Well, yea, i also put the answer B, but i think that right answer is A. Look up Kaplan in Genetics section - Linkage Disqulibrium. And plz, explan me - what is random assorsment. I found it only in microbial genetics , and it doesn`t fit here
Edited by Yulik08 on 06/10/08 - 12:58 PM
|
| shazbaz
Forum Junior
Topics: 15
Posts: 51
|
linkage equilibrium makes most sense....since the expected probability of both alleles together is 0.2 *0.2 = 0.04 or 4% but since they appear together at 16% they must be linked and so linkage disequilibrium. Random assortment i think just means when in miosis homologous chromosomes are randomly segragating into different gametes.
|
|
| |
| | | | | | |
