Prep for USMLEPrep for USMLE Forum
   Forum    Step 1  Step 2 CK Step 2 CS Step 3  Match  IMGs Resources Search






Previous Topic | Next Topic  267/99. EXP. 




 
Kaplan Qbank USMLE



Author33 Posts
  #26

great work genbot!nod any advice for step 1 [havent given step 2 yet

  #27

Generally i found that in comparison to psychiatry (on step2), behavioural science Qs on step1 were easier to answer. Diagnostic problems were simpler and if you prep well it shouldn't be a problem at all, although getting a hang of it in the first place is a lil exasperating. But do a couple of revisions and u should be alright. UW is also a decent help with the subject.
What i found difficult on the exam were the ethics questions, I simply had no idea how to answer them. Although they say common sense can help with these questions but i found it impossible to separate the different presented options. At present i know of no resource which can help with this.

___________________
Step1 267/99. Step2 269/99. CS pass. ECFMG certified. Match 2009. MAY THE FORCE BE WITH ME (The one they call the strong nuclear force!)

  #28

hi genbot...i have a similar problem....i took step-2 first...so i know the DSM and the clinical psychiatry well...also biostats is fine...but the core behav sciences chapters are a bit of problem...specially- learning and behavior modifications/defence mechs..i did UW of behac sc...most qs i answered on my step-2 knowledge..i feel i havent learnt anything new in behav sc.....and i get most of the qs given at the end of the chapters in behav science kaplan notes wrong...how were the qs in the real exam? like UW ? or core behav sc ? anyother tips for behav sc?


  #29

lakshya,

Although u get a mix of questions on the test but i feel if u've done step2 previously u should focus more on working on wat u call 'core behav science'. The clinical part is fairly simple and straightforward as compared to step2.

___________________
Step1 267/99. Step2 269/99. CS pass. ECFMG certified. Match 2009. MAY THE FORCE BE WITH ME (The one they call the strong nuclear force!)

  #30

smiling faceTHANX GENBOT

  #31

I liked your take on UW. I will probably try it out. But there is no question about the 50 day prep. I'm not that good! sticking out tongue grin


___________________
2008 Step 1 Study Plan Discussion ........ My Blog

  #32

genbot wrote:
Thanks sidiyaa, dr_elrifai85!
I'm from India.

Shwe thanks again!smiling face

Comin to ur questions...I dont know how representative my prep is that of a perfect one...reason; ideally i would've wanted it to be 3 to 4 months and probably then it would've been more organized. For someone starting out new i'd recommend this prep duration.
Because i was short on time and felt i did not have the patience to sit one place and study for a long time, i chose a short duration for my prep. It wasnt an easy decision.It had its risks but i was willing to trust my instincts and was relying heavily on the ability of the NBMEs to assess my level of prep.

Keeping these limitations in mind my prep was bound to be inherently a little chaotic.
Although i'd prefer startin with UW after having finished with the first read but instead i chose to begin about 10 days into my first read. The idea was to finish most of UW along with my first read so that when i took my NBME i'd have gone through most prep material. And then during my second read i'd improve on my weaknesses while not totally ignoring my strengths and also revise UW as much as possible. Plus i also wanted to do questions from other Qbanks. Basically i wanted to do as many questions as possible and importantly keep doin them as close to the exam day as possible. I felt that was very important. This perception i derived amazingly from my step2 experience. Although i did pretty well on the exam, i felt i could've done better if i'd kept doin Qs as close to the exam day as possible. During my step2 prep i stopped doin Qs about 1 month from the exam! That was basically crazy. I wasnt goin to repeat that again, and i didnt. I thought the approach paid off well; i got a better score (percentile not 3 digit score!) with a shorter prep time.

UWorld: I did all questions in timed, random, mixed mode.
This is what i'd recommend to most people, especially if u'r finished with atleast one read or maybe two; depending on what ur prep duration is and how good ur basics are when u start out.
I feel doin questions subject wise gives u a false sense of security. it tends to overestimate ur level of prep and u also miss out on getting constant practice on having to change ur thought patterns quicky, as the real exam demands.
Although i've heard people say that UW should be used mainly as a learning tool, i disagree.
I feel if u revise wrong Qs and ones u mark as high yield and pay attention to most explanations while doin Qs the first time, this should more than suffice the need for using UW as a learning tool. May be i'm wrong but from what I've seen i dont see people deriving any special advantage by doin it subject wise.
I think Kaplan is good basic learning material and when supplemented properly with UW almost assures u a good score.
Also important is assessment of ur strengths and weaknessess. This not only focusses ur prep but also helps to cut down on its duration. Both UW and NBME can be used for this purpose.
And no i didnt do 7 blocks at a time on UW. I feel that would be more helpful with step 2ck which has very drawn out question stems and where fatigue towards the end of the test can be a big factor in determining ur final score.

I also did about a 1000 qs from kaplan Qbank when i finished with UW. They were good and helped me stay in sync with the actual exam. And as i mentioned before i also managed to finish kaplan Qbook during the last 4 days. Again they provided good practice and kept me grounded with the actual exam. Overall i felt the real exam had much more clinical material than either UW or Qbank. UW patterns were definitely closer to the actual exam than Qbank. No doubt bout that.

FA i did only once. But i'd recommend atleast 2 reads to most people, especially if u feel u've forgotten some basic facts close to the exam. Its short, precise and very high yield.
Again i did FA pretty random. Read it once i had finished with the first read. Did not ally it to my Kaplan notes reading. But probably goin through it while reading similar topics from Kaplan might be more helpful. It helps u a lot with figuring out extreme high yield stuff. Knowledge which u can utilise well when u go thru Kaplan notes (and probably UW).

This is it for now...but there's lots more stuff comin...so keep checkin.smiling face


gringrin sorry for really late reply saying ......... THANK YOU for ur long detail patient replies .
I was in milee etc the March, MAy group busy supporting them , busy with life too so not get chance to check here back, thnx for the valuable advice , so in that case will try uw as early as possible .

GL in ur CS nodcoolnod


  #33

P499,
I'm glad you like the way i put it. But a 99 in 50 days? Certainly possible with a lil bit of belief and a whole lot of hardwork.smiling face

Shwe,
You're one of the sweetest persons i know. Do ask if you need any help anytime. I'll do my best.smiling facesmiling facesmiling face

___________________
Step1 267/99. Step2 269/99. CS pass. ECFMG certified. Match 2009. MAY THE FORCE BE WITH ME (The one they call the strong nuclear force!)







You don't have permission to post.




Login or Register to post messages in this topic





















Contact | Leaders | Disclaimer | Privacy

Copyright @ Prep for USMLE. All rights reserved.