patpelletier Forum Junior
Topics: 12 Posts: 32
| | 02/05/08 - 09:01 PM  
 
   
 
|   #1 |
18 yo female G2P1 prenatal visit,10 wks pregnant and last pregnancy complicated by severe contractions and light vaginal bleeding which led to CS at 30 wks. What is her future risk according to her h/x? A) Stillbirth B) Placenta Previa C) PreEclampsia D) Preterm labor E) PROM
|
| arlete Intern in 2009!!!!!
Topics: 42 Posts: 2,944
| | 02/05/08 - 09:05 PM  
 
   
 
|   #2 |
D
___________________ Que sera sera, whatever will be will be.
|
| patpelletier Forum Junior
Topics: 12 Posts: 32
| | 02/05/08 - 09:11 PM  
 
   
 
|   #3 |
Thank you. I thought so too. In another thread the answer was P Previa.
|
| Ivonne Find a way or make one

Topics: 58 Posts: 1,611
| | 02/05/08 - 10:30 PM  
 
   
 
|   #4 |
Pre-term labor
___________________ 92/99/pass/ECFMG certified/4 US LoRs/GC/extensive USCE/2004 grad/appl 29 IM Prog, IV/Rej: 3/0 "I must, I can and I will"
|
| nany Forum Guru

Topics: 14 Posts: 1,060
| | 02/06/08 - 04:38 AM  
 
   
 
|   #5 |
isn't this a case of previous abrubtio placents [ uterine contractions + vaginal bleeding ] ? isn't this a reisk for future Placenta Previa ? I mean , preterm labor is just preterm labor, without bleeding
___________________ " You Are Limited Only By What You Think "
|
| patpelletier Forum Junior
Topics: 12 Posts: 32
| | 02/06/08 - 04:54 PM  
 
   
 
|   #6 |
So what is your point, I don't understand.
|
| nany Forum Guru

Topics: 14 Posts: 1,060
| | 02/07/08 - 09:10 AM  
 
   
 
|   #7 |
I mean that this patient didn't experience Preterm labor per say, but she experienced Abruptio Placents....., which is a risk for Placenta previa not for preterm labor... am I right or what?...hope my point is clear
___________________ " You Are Limited Only By What You Think "
|
| nyimalay Forum Elite
Topics: 11 Posts: 288
| | 02/07/08 - 09:22 AM  
 
   
 
|   #8 |
D contraction+++, bleeding+ means preterm labour.
|
| arlete Intern in 2009!!!!!
Topics: 42 Posts: 2,944
| | 02/07/08 - 10:04 AM  
 
   
 
|   #9 |
Abruptio placenta generally is not light bleeding. Even if the patient has a retroplacental hematoma, she most likelly has hypotension, orthostatics and/or profuse bleeding once the placenta is delivered. The question does not mention anything like that. That's why I think it was premature labor.
___________________ Que sera sera, whatever will be will be.
|
| nany Forum Guru

Topics: 14 Posts: 1,060
| | 02/07/08 - 03:34 PM  
 
   
 
|   #10 |
if it was preterm labor in 30 weeks as the question says......then why did they deliver here by CS???
___________________ " You Are Limited Only By What You Think "
|
| farnsworth Forum Newbie
Topics: 0 Posts: 165
| | 02/07/08 - 03:46 PM  
 
   
 
|   #11 |
I would go for (B): previous CS increases the risk for placentia praevia (if I remember this right). It increases the risk for uterine rupture, too. But I am not too sure.
|
| patpelletier Forum Junior
Topics: 12 Posts: 32
| | 02/07/08 - 03:50 PM  
 
   
 
|   #12 |
So if it was abrubtio what is she at risk for?
|
| patpelletier Forum Junior
Topics: 12 Posts: 32
| | 02/07/08 - 03:52 PM  
 
   
 
|   #13 |
A CS is a risk for placenta acreta where villi are invading the myometrium.
|
| arlete Intern in 2009!!!!!
Topics: 42 Posts: 2,944
| | 02/07/08 - 04:33 PM  
 
   
 
|   #14 |
You are right, nany, why would they do a c-section? Maybe it was an abruption placenta!
___________________ Que sera sera, whatever will be will be.
|
| nany Forum Guru

Topics: 14 Posts: 1,060
| | 02/07/08 - 05:19 PM  
 
   
 
|   #15 |
yyyyyyyyeeeeeeeee
___________________ " You Are Limited Only By What You Think "
|
| farnsworth Forum Newbie
Topics: 0 Posts: 165
| | 02/07/08 - 07:08 PM  
 
   
 
|   #16 |
OK, CS is not a risk factor for placenta praevia... So my guess is most probably wrong
|
| patpelletier Forum Junior
Topics: 12 Posts: 32
| | 02/07/08 - 07:12 PM  
 
   
 
|   #17 |
Actually, just surfed the web and prior trauma to uterus and CS are in fact risks for previa. So it seems that the answer is previa.
|
| dr_arc Forum Senior
Topics: 5 Posts: 156
| | 02/07/08 - 07:20 PM  
 
   
 
|   #18 |
previous csection sounds like a bigger risk than the possible abruption in previous pregnancy. irrrespective of the cause for previous Csectn, the scar on the lower uterus makes her more likely to have a low lying placenta/placenta previa and the risk increases with increasing number of csections in her pregnancy. a scar on the uterus in one of the worst things to have in a obsetric history.
|
| nyimalay Forum Elite
Topics: 11 Posts: 288
| | 02/07/08 - 08:53 PM  
 
   
 
|   #19 |
Yes. I have to change my answer. Whatever the reason for CS, the scar in uterus is at risk for placenta previa. Please post the correct answer if any of you have it.
|
| nany Forum Guru

Topics: 14 Posts: 1,060
| | 02/08/08 - 01:26 AM  
 
   
 
|   #20 |
dr_arc wrote: previous csection sounds like a bigger risk than the possible abruption in previous pregnancy. irrrespective of the cause for previous Csectn, the scar on the lower uterus makes her more likely to have a low lying placenta/placenta previa agree with that
___________________ " You Are Limited Only By What You Think "
|
| anuba Forum Elite
Topics: 6 Posts: 449
| | 02/09/08 - 01:02 AM  
 
   
 
|   #21 |
I agree w/ nany & dr arc.
|
| inkspot Forum Guru

Topics: 33 Posts: 625
| | 02/29/08 - 10:33 AM  
 
   
 
|   #22 |
scar in tissue can lead to premature contraction? but i agree previa should be the answer. also if i recall it right (from my final yr days) there are two types of CS. one is high and the other is low. and one of them has increase risk of previa. please some one throw more light on this!
___________________ Need Visa 2005 grad/89/92/CS passed/Step3 soon/1 mo USCE/ 2 publication in home country/ 1 Research/volunteer work/ Aagae Aagae Dekho hota hai kiya !!!
|
| arlete Intern in 2009!!!!!
Topics: 42 Posts: 2,944
| | 02/29/08 - 06:19 PM  
 
   
 
|   #23 |
I think both increase the risk. But the longitudinal one increases more the risk for uterine rupture, and the horizontal one, done over the inferior segment (bikini line) increases more the placenta previa formation.
___________________ Que sera sera, whatever will be will be.
|
| docofthebigapple Forum Senior

Topics: 23 Posts: 182
| | 03/07/08 - 04:41 PM  
 
   
 
|   #24 |
Placenta previa is one of the indications for CS. I do not know if having a CS increases the chances of future Placenta previa. Having light vaginal bleeding in the thirt trimester would corelate with a patient having a placenta previa that as we understand the lower uterine segment expands and the placental attachment is challenged. Hence the light vaginal bleeding. Having a CS in this situation will also fit in well. The question asks about future risk. I have an inkling for placenta previa. B P.S. Classical vertical incision isn't performed anymore thesedays.
|
| smal Forum Guru

Topics: 140 Posts: 727
| | 03/08/08 - 01:24 AM  
 
   
 
|   #25 |
http://pregnancy.about.com/cs/placentaprevia/a/pr... I go with B.
___________________ remedy for weakness is not brooding over it ,but thinking of strength.
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |