DrVirgo Forum Hero

Topics: 1042 Posts: 3,344
| | 01/13/08 - 10:09 AM  
 
   
 
|   #1 |
A 49 year old Affrican American woman with hypertension and hyperlipidemia is evaluated in the emergency department with complaints of overwhelming episodes of severe pounding headache, profuse sweating, and palpitations. The patient reports a sense of impending doom during these episodes. She is tachycardic and hypertensive. Which of the following is the best imaging test for diagnosing and localizing the cause of this patient's symptoms? A. Abdominal aortic angiography B. CT Scan C. I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scan D. Nephrotomography E. Sonography
___________________ Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall.
|
| viket Forum Newbie

Topics: 1 Posts: 11
| | 01/13/08 - 10:48 AM  
 
   
 
|   #2 |
B. i would go with CT scan becouse it will (in most cases) detect a tumor. Among other answers we could use sonography but it will not visualise the tumor if it is very small. I-metaiodbenzylguanidin scan is the method of choice if there is high level of catheholamines and CT, MRI and sonography did not detect tumor.
|
| RX 135 Forum Elite

Topics: 21 Posts: 509
| | 01/13/08 - 10:57 AM  
 
   
 
|   #3 |
ct/mri not 100% sensitive cause they dont identify extra adrenal tumors...
___________________ :-( :-( :-(...
|
| drduck Forum Guru
Topics: 82 Posts: 529
| | 01/13/08 - 10:59 AM  
 
   
 
|   #4 |
under imaging modalities CT scan is the BEST diagnotic tool. MRI some how is better as T1 and T2 image lets better differentiation between benign adenomas and malignant ones. but diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is always BIOCHEMICAL....and localisation of the tumor and extent need to be assesed by IMAGING methods. I-MIBG scan shud be done only if after confirmation of pheochromocytoma by biochemistry assays, imaging doesnot reveal any mass, this is specially useful if the lesion is less than 10 cms in diameter. if it is >10 cms CT/MRI is the better option as MIBG creats lot more confusion.
|
| RX 135 Forum Elite

Topics: 21 Posts: 509
| | 01/13/08 - 11:03 AM  
 
   
 
|   #5 |
guess...I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scan..
___________________ :-( :-( :-(...
|
| viket Forum Newbie

Topics: 1 Posts: 11
| | 01/13/08 - 11:08 AM  
 
   
 
|   #6 |
But to perform I-MIBG we must have biochemistry?!
|
| tamerbashir Forum Elite
Topics: 20 Posts: 284
| | 01/13/08 - 11:47 AM  
 
   
 
|   #7 |
CT
|
| hero Forum Elite
Topics: 37 Posts: 393
| | 01/13/08 - 11:52 AM  
 
   
 
|   #8 |
interesting article here http://jnm.snmjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/2...
|
| DrVirgo Forum Hero

Topics: 1042 Posts: 3,344
| | 01/13/08 - 11:59 AM  
 
   
 
|   #9 |
C. I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scan is the right answer. There is no mention of this in Kaplan notes 2007, where they say do CT. And this question is from 2003 Kaplan simulated exam... So i'm wondering if its accurate.. Any thoughts?
___________________ Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall.
|
| neurom Forum Senior

Topics: 2 Posts: 127
| | 01/13/08 - 12:24 PM  
 
   
 
|   #10 |
I disagree with the answer. MIBG should be done after biocemically confirmed diagnosis and CT is negative.
___________________ "Nature magically suits a man to his fortunes, by making them the fruit of his character".
|
| hero Forum Elite
Topics: 37 Posts: 393
| | 01/13/08 - 12:30 PM  
 
   
 
|   #11 |
emedicine has 2 articles with bit different point of view on imaging studies. 1. Scintigraphy with radiolabeled 131I-MIBG or 123I-MIBG is indicated. MIBG scintigraphy allows whole-body exploration. Owing to its high specificity (97%), this morphological study seems to be a valuable adjunct in the detection of extra-adrenal lesions. The main limitation of MIBG scintigraphy is its slightly lower sensitivity (adrenal, 84%; extra-adrenal, 64%) than MRI (adrenal, 97%; extra-adrenal, 88%) or CT scanning (adrenal, 94%; extra-adrenal, 64%). However, despite the lower sensitivity, MIBG scanning offers the greatest specificity, and tumors seen on these images are almost certainly pheochromocytomas. If the MIBG scanning results are positive in a child, consider a diagnosis of neuroblastoma until proven differently. When a pheochromocytoma is suspected biochemically and is not visualized on standard studies, consider the possibility of an intrathoracic or intracranial tumor. MRI is probably the best study for detecting extra-abdominal tumors, although MIBG scanning may help reveal the general location of the tumor. CT scans or MRI can be focused in that region to localize the tumor. MIBG may be used to seek extra-adrenal tumors or to provide additional diagnostic information about adrenal masses found with conventional techniques. 2. A scan with iodine I 131–labeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is reserved for cases in which a pheochromocytoma is confirmed biochemically but CT scanning or MRI do not show a tumor. The molecular structure of iodine I 123 MIBG resembles norepinephrine and concentrates within adrenal or extra-adrenal pheochromocytomas. This isotope has a short half-life and is expensive. It frequently is used in cases of familial pheochromocytoma syndromes, recurrent pheochromocytoma, or malignant pheochromocytoma. In the United States, only 131I-labeled MIBG is available, whereas 123I MIBG is used in Europe and Japan. Might bcs of it cost it can't be recommended as a first or routine, but q asking about the best imaging test for diagnosing and localizing,which is likely to be this one
|
| Ivonne Forum Guru

Topics: 51 Posts: 1,392
| | 01/13/08 - 01:00 PM  
 
   
 
|   #12 |
I agree with C, very well explained in hero's post and UW. This last one states that CT scan should be done after biochemical dx is confirmed and that normal adrenal glands on CT doesn't rule out the tumor in extra-adrenal location.
___________________ If you beleive you can do it then you WILL DO IT!! (by Mymeghhi)
|
| DrVirgo Forum Hero

Topics: 1042 Posts: 3,344
| | 01/13/08 - 01:03 PM  
 
   
 
|   #13 |
OK, thanks for the sources and discussion... I'm glad you all agree with CT, because that is how I answered the question as well, but was surprised to see otherwise on the explanation... Maybe this was an old question. Again, thanks for confirming my suspicion.
___________________ Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall.
|
| Ivonne Forum Guru

Topics: 51 Posts: 1,392
| | 01/13/08 - 01:19 PM  
 
   
 
|   #14 |
just wanted to add up to the discussion that IF the patient also would have high blood calcium level and a family h/o hypertension we should rule out MEN type II a by measuring calcitonin level.
___________________ If you beleive you can do it then you WILL DO IT!! (by Mymeghhi)
|
| multifactorial Forum Guru
Topics: 28 Posts: 546
| | 01/13/08 - 08:27 PM  
 
   
 
|   #15 |
CT scan
|
| cool doctor Forum Junior

Topics: 1 Posts: 219
| | 01/14/08 - 06:01 AM  
 
   
 
|   #16 |
the question is about the best and its MIBG but the next step in imaging is CT or MRI
|
| DrVirgo Forum Hero

Topics: 1042 Posts: 3,344
| | 01/14/08 - 07:20 AM  
 
   
 
|   #17 |
The explanation to this question said that: C. I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scan can detect pheos which are adrenal as well as extra adrenal. I am having this doubt since this was a Kaplan question (simulated exam) but there was NO mention of this scan in the notes... ONLY CT is mentioned...
___________________ Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall.
|
| cool doctor Forum Junior

Topics: 1 Posts: 219
| | 01/14/08 - 08:59 AM  
 
   
 
|   #18 |
Thats100% correct dear virgo if the CT didnt show anything and u still suspect the pheo, this MIBG is the best method to find it especialy if its extramedullary pheo.
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |