shirini2 Forum Senior
Topics: 27 Posts: 86
| | 12/30/07 - 07:07 PM  
 
   
 
|   #1 |
A new test is being evaluated for the diagnosis of a pulmonary embolus. Studies indicate that a positive test result has the likelihood ratio of 15, and that a negative test result has a likelihood ratio of 0.85. Which one of the following is a correct conclusion? 1) This test may be helpful for ruling in a pulmonary embolus. 2) This test is highly sensitive for pulmonary emboli. 3) This test will be very helpful in a clinical setting. 4) This test has a negative predictive value is 85%. 5) This test is very reliable.
|
| tamerbashir Forum Elite
Topics: 21 Posts: 285
| | 12/31/07 - 02:18 AM  
 
   
 
|   #2 |
2 - increae false +ve increase sensitvity ? need explaination very weak in statics
|
| cool doctor Forum Junior

Topics: 1 Posts: 231
| | 12/31/07 - 04:09 AM  
 
   
 
|   #3 |
4
|
| shirini2 Forum Senior
Topics: 27 Posts: 86
| | 01/01/08 - 06:42 AM  
 
   
 
|   #4 |
thanks cool doctor. I think 4 too but wasn't sure. could you give any explanation for that?
|
| arlete Half way there!

Topics: 43 Posts: 3,095
| | 01/01/08 - 09:55 AM  
 
   
 
|   #5 |
"likelihood ratio is the likelihood that a given test result would be expected in a patient with a certain disorder compared to the likelihood that that same result would occur in a patient without the target disorder." So, it's sensitivity, right? I think it's 2.
___________________ Que sera sera, whatever will be will be.
|
| anastamosis Forum Senior

Topics: 34 Posts: 167
| | 01/01/08 - 11:59 AM  
 
   
 
|   #6 |
2. agree with arlete
___________________ THE HIGHER YOU AIM, THE HIGHER YOU REACH !! My contacts are as follows ==> yahoo id --> anastamosis_e2e;gmail id --> anastamosis;Skype id --> anastamosis
|
| shirini2 Forum Senior
Topics: 27 Posts: 86
| | 01/02/08 - 08:32 AM  
 
   
 
|   #7 |
OK. Thank you. 
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | |