MAGY17 Forum Elite

Topics: 30 Posts: 234
| | 11/27/07 - 01:54 PM  
 
   
 
|   #1 |
EXPLAIN IT ,PLEASE
Attached Files:
000_5380.jpg (342 KB, 62 downloads)

|
| MAGY17 Forum Elite

Topics: 30 Posts: 234
| | 11/27/07 - 04:44 PM  
 
   
 
|   #2 |
may be m?????????????
|
| MAGY17 Forum Elite

Topics: 30 Posts: 234
| | 11/27/07 - 04:46 PM  
 
   
 
|   #3 |
how can l do the diferent betwin ventricular tachycardia vs paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia
|
| brooklynmed Forum Newbie
Topics: 10 Posts: 19
| | 11/27/07 - 05:29 PM  
 
   
 
|   #4 |
I think it's SVT......SVT is HR > 140 i think
|
| Gourdon
Topics: 14 Posts: 77
| | 11/27/07 - 05:39 PM  
 
   
 
|   #5 |
F V tach usually is predisposed by ischemia
|
| MAGY17 Forum Elite

Topics: 30 Posts: 234
| | 11/29/07 - 08:57 PM  
 
   
 
|   #6 |
thanks
|
| Vietnamese Forum Elite
Topics: 11 Posts: 277
| | 11/30/07 - 02:07 AM  
 
   
 
|   #7 |
F - SVT
___________________ Nothing is impossible.
|
| sherry39 Forum Junior
Topics: 3 Posts: 105
| | 02/29/08 - 04:20 AM  
 
   
 
|   #8 |
1st see that pulse is regular...it rules out all supraventricular causes 2nd see that iv medication corrects sinus rhythm..it means that all sinus causes are ruled out.. left are A,B,H,L,M options that suggest ventricular causes...it cant be v fib as vitals are relatively stable..95/60 bp..increase pulse wid decrease bp shows that sympathetic n other reflexes are working hence it shoud be idiopathic junctional tachycardia.also shortness of breath is called angina equivalent with cardiac symptoms...it shows ventricles are beating with such a rate that diastolic time is reduced hence no perfusion i think i am werong.,if anybody wid much better explanation.,plz correct me
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | |