Prep for USMLEPrep for USMLE Forum
   Forum    Step 1  Step 2 CK Step 2 CS Step 3  Match  IMGs Resources Search






Previous Topic | Next Topic  TB qqs 




 
Kaplan Qbank USMLE



Author16 Posts
  #1

A 37 y.o. health care worker had a PPD skin reactive test at 17mm ten years ago at the end of her internship. She never took the recommended isoniazid. What is appropriate for this patient?

A. Do nothing
B. Start isoniazid for the next nine months
C. Perform a single PPD now
D. Yearly chest x-ray
E. Two-stage PPD testing


An HIV-positive woman find out that someone at her workplace ha s tuberculosis.
Her PPD is negative now and it was negative last year. Her chest x-ray is normal.
What should you do next for her?

A. Nothing further is required
B. Repeat the PPD in 3 months
C. Start  isoniazid and stop in 3 months if PPD is negative
D. Start  isoniazid for full 9 months
E.  Yearly chest x-ray 


  #2

c .... ????

d ... start inh for 9 months

  #3

1) B

2) B

  #4

1 A

If she had TB ,it would have manifested since 10 years ago,there's no need for anything now

2 D






  #5

B It's never late to give the RX. I think so.

D Her is the exception rule for HIV patients and < 2yr old.

  #6

1- B (my second best answer would be D)
2- D because it is wrist if she gets the disease than the side effects from the medication(base on fisher)

___________________
As a general rule, the better it felt when you said it, the more trouble it's going to get you into.

  #7

1.B
2.D

  #8

1. a

2. b


___________________
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, and the lesson afterwards.

  #9

Kamsi you're correct.nod
A
D

  #10

^^Ahhhhhhhhh I'll jump down the river grin........ explain pleaseeee

  #11

#1. A. If the pt had not developed TB becouse of the previous exposure, she is not going to now, there is no point in giving a pt isoniazid now to prevent TB thet would have happened years ago after the initial exposure.

  #12

so on the second question, say the chick has a cd4 of 500+, are your still going to place her on prophylaxis?

I'm looking at FA, and it says for HIV+, you need an induration >5 to be considerered +. The stem says PPD neg. Now it could possibly be too soon for the test result to be positive. Which is why I think you would test again in 3 months, rather then put her on pills.


___________________
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, and the lesson afterwards.

  #13

According to Conrad Fischer:
Answer:

(D) Start isoniazid for a full nine months

Explanation:

If a patient has been exposed to tuberculosis (TB), and the tuberculosis skin test (PPD) is negative, you do not have to do a chest x-ray. The PPD should be repeated at three months. Most patients who have been exposed to TB and who are going to develop a positive PPD will do so within three months of the exposure, and the PPD should be repeated at 12 weeks. So, she should have the repeat test. However, it is more important to start treatment with isoniazid. There is no reason to give isoniazid to most patients if the PPD is negative. The only exception to this rule is in small children under two years of age who can have a serious exposure but still have a negative PPD because of immature T cells. The other exception is an HIV-positive patient with profound immunosupression and a very low T-cell count who has a serious exposure, such as someone in their own household. There is no routine indication for yearly chest x-rays in any population. Any person with a newly positive PPD should get a chest x-ray. This person's test, however, was negative.


  #14

"The other exception is an HIV-positive patient with profound immunosupression and a very low T-cell count who has a serious exposure, such as someone in their own household"

ok that's the ticket. So if they say low CD4, or give other indications of severe immunosuppression then start INH. Otherwise it's retest in 3 months even for HIV+ individual.

thanks for the explanation.


___________________
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, and the lesson afterwards.

  #15

thanks for the explaination......... good to know now lol.....

  #16

if this is the case that in hiv positive person with immunosupression we have to give isoniazid then why are we doing ppd in the first place....why not go ahead n treat every exposure of such person with isoniazid...i dont get thsi logic.....and why are u repeating ppd if u are treating the patient ....







You don't have permission to post.




Login or Register to post messages in this topic





















Contact | Leaders | Disclaimer | Privacy

Copyright @ Prep for USMLE. All rights reserved.