cjlin Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 9
| | 09/22/07 - 10:14 AM  
 
   
1 of 10 forum leaders found this post helpful  
|   #1 |
Glad to contribute as this forum helped a lot. Exam date=8/30/07 Report date=9/19/07 My background: med student from Taiwan, an above average in the best school here. did top 1% in the Taiwan Step1 equivalent few months earlier. test taken after the 5th year, which is like M3 in the US system. I think this is a good timing, since I've got some clinical viewpoint before basic facts fade from my mind. Preparation time: about 1 year. overall avg 2 hr/day I started last summer, finished Moore's clinical oriented anatomy during the summer and then Gray's anatomy for student (both are helpful, but not the best way to spend time) then read FA once. Then school started. The first 2 months rotation was IM and I spent most of the time reading Harrison's. From Dec to Aug did I really study. I put in 2~3 hours per day, but most of the time I couldn't do more as my attention drifted.. Books used: ana: Moore's, Gray's for student, Lange Roadmap, HY (both good, with different focus; I prefer Roadmap) emb: HY neuroana: HY, a blue book from Lange, guess it's called clinical neuroanatomy.. borrowed patho: BRS, Robbins review Physio: BRS Histo: HY, only once Pharm: katzung review Micro/Immune: Lange review BS: BRS Biochem: HY, BRS comprehensive: FA(gold standard for sure), HY (good as a FA complement, only once) Qs: Qbook (fair), UW(excellent), Qbank(helpful, but poor C/P) Lange Goldberg tests (do not recommend) For most of these review books I did 2-3 times depending on my strenghth, eg i hardly needed histo, but read 3-4+ times on BS and biochem. Used UW Mar-May, 68% first round, second round was above 80% used Qbank Jun-Aug, 72%. did not do second round most of the time i can finish a block with 20 mins left. rarely doublecheck is my habit Regarding the test, the first 3 blocks were done smoothly with surplus time. then ate a little bit fourth block started to mark and think more often.. break and ate full lunch fifth was bumpy, break and went to restroom sixth came smooth again, and went strait to 7th. the difficulty was between NBME and UW, more like NBME. interface was UW, without pause or stop. I got several qs almost the same as NBME. pulm embolism and intestinal ion channels were tested around 5 qs each!!
|
| nyimalay Forum Elite
Topics: 11 Posts: 288
| | 09/22/07 - 11:56 AM  
 
   
 
|   #2 |
Congratulation! One question please. Did your NBME scores reflect the real exam score. Thanks,
|
| angel^Doctor Forum Guru
Topics: 35 Posts: 480
| | 09/22/07 - 12:52 PM  
 
   
 
|   #3 |
u kind of have some back ground as mine .. with some differnces .. my exam is in 2 days .. hope to do as good as u congratulations
___________________ The more I know, the more I don't know!
|
| Stepin2007 Forum Newbie
Topics: 3 Posts: 29
| | 09/22/07 - 05:00 PM  
 
   
 
|   #4 |
WOW congratulation for the AWESOME score... DANG... what were your scores like in NBME (if you don't mind sharing)???
|
| beiwen Forum Elite

Topics: 23 Posts: 238
| | 09/22/07 - 05:32 PM  
 
   
 
|   #5 |
Congratulations!!! what a great score!!!
___________________ BW
|
| cjlin Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 9
| | 09/22/07 - 10:50 PM  
 
   
0 of 3 forum leaders found this post helpful  
|   #6 |
forgot to mention I also posted in the score thread, #403 (don't know how to post the link though..) Step 1 score 3/2: 264/99 Q-bankscore/% complete: 72/100, completed 1 day earlier to exam NBME 1/ time b4 exam: 660/250 / 4 days prior NBME 2/ time b4 exam: 700/256 / 20 days prior NBME 3/ 600/240 / 3 months earlier NBME 4/ 750/261 / 12 days earlier USMLE CD/ time b4 exam: did not do (I use Mac) Kaplan diagnostic: did not do UW: 68%/100% first time, completed 3 months prior It seems NBME was closest to the real thing, both Qs and score i did better than the "UW formula" predicted (somewhere like 230-240) good luck angel^doctor
|
| kity Certified.............
Topics: 32 Posts: 1,063
| | 09/23/07 - 12:44 AM  
 
   
 
|   #7 |
congratulations for the awsome score.. could you please tell me subject wise distributions of exam Qs Thanks.. Good luck
___________________ NO PAIN .. NO GAIN ..
|
| kity Certified.............
Topics: 32 Posts: 1,063
| | 09/23/07 - 12:46 AM  
 
   
 
|   #8 |
& could you please tell me this UW formula too which predicts your score... was wondering what it is since long time Thanks & congrats again
___________________ NO PAIN .. NO GAIN ..
|
| cjlin Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 9
| | 09/23/07 - 03:00 AM  
 
   
 
|   #9 |
i'd like to recall this formula but i'm afraid not since i did UW long ago.. i'm sure it's buried in the exam score thread it's kind of like 2.44*UW+70 or something like that.. not sure.. good luck
|
| edie I can, and I will.

Topics: 26 Posts: 1,202
| | 09/23/07 - 01:42 PM  
 
   
 
|   #10 |
Awesome! Congratulations 
|
| medocuk IM-RES

Topics: 26 Posts: 1,467
| | 09/23/07 - 02:06 PM  
 
   
 
|   #11 |
Well done Congratulations.
|
| dr ruman Forum Elite

Topics: 32 Posts: 368
| | 09/26/07 - 05:01 PM  
 
   
 
|   #12 |
oh Lord awesome score,ots lots Congrats ,all heartily wishes 4 step 2
___________________ Living each day as a preparation for the next is an exciting way to live. Looking forward to something is much more fun than looking back at something—so lets do it together
|
| Jackofknives Ipwnpoker.com

Topics: 91 Posts: 733
| | 09/27/07 - 01:27 PM  
 
   
 
|   #13 |
Congratulations, you score seems credible.
___________________ There are many things in this world that can’t be changed no matter how hard you try. That’s why you must not hesitate when the time comes where you have to give it all you’ve got.
|
| deja_vu Forum Elite

Topics: 10 Posts: 345
| | 09/30/07 - 06:57 AM  
 
   
 
|   #14 |
Wow congrats for the great score!! Your formula is just too good [2.44xUW + 70 =real score] my score was EXACTLY 2.44xUW+70!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you find the formula for step2 from somewhere please post here.. THanks
___________________ Neuro-PrelimIM/IMG-2007/H1-J1/266/272/pass/OngoinMPH/IV-Rej:Neuro:5-3,Preli mIM 2-3 [Updated-September,22] " Beware of what you want, because you'll get it." Emerson
|
| cjlin Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 9
| | 09/30/07 - 09:39 AM  
 
   
 
|   #15 |
the formula kind of underestimated my score but i am happy with it thanks to all
|
| kity Certified.............
Topics: 32 Posts: 1,063
| | 09/30/07 - 12:35 PM  
 
   
 
|   #16 |
Hey cjlin Thanks for the formula..
___________________ NO PAIN .. NO GAIN ..
|
| drmohamed811 Forum Senior

Topics: 19 Posts: 98
| | 10/03/07 - 08:09 AM  
 
   
 
|   #17 |
congratulation doc
___________________ لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله
|
| GoodGirl Forum Guru

Topics: 102 Posts: 1,395
| | 10/03/07 - 08:47 AM  
 
   
 
|   #18 |
Shockingly great score ! Congratulations.
___________________ Prioritize & simplify.
|
| alirezajkh
| | 10/17/07 - 01:45 AM  
 
   
 
|   #19 |
good luck for step 2
|
| jaZjaM Forum Newbie

Topics: 1 Posts: 118
| | 10/17/07 - 03:21 AM  
 
   
 
|   #20 |
WOW!! Coool..Great score.. Good luck fr future..
|
| manu_2007 Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 5
| | 11/05/07 - 01:18 PM  
 
   
 
|   #21 |
Hi cjlin, congratulations.I am a first year med student from India. I want to appear USMLE step 1 after my second year. Should I start solving questions from USMLE World Q Bank from now ? You mentioned that you have studied Moore's clinically oriented anatomy . Which portion did you stressed upon ? Didn't you study Ganong in Physio & Lipincott in biochem ? Is only BRS sufficient or Kaplan lecture notes also required ?
|
| cjlin Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 9
| | 11/08/07 - 08:12 AM  
 
   
 
|   #22 |
manu_2007, Thanks for the questions. I suggest you start those qbanks after the first read so that you obtain a comprehensive view of the material before being skewed by their qs. The Moore was read cover to cover, without a particular emphasis. I, however, do not recommend this approach. My major physio textbooks in school were Guyton and Berne. I had Guyton but did not seriously read it. I did not use Lippincott biochem because it was too thick despite my weakness in biochem. My major prep biochem book was BRS. I did not use Kaplan at all. I believe most books are about the same quality. It does not really matter what book you use. I thnk two random books could cover pretty much what is to know. What matters is your devotion and understanding of the material.
|
| manu_2007 Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 5
| | 11/08/07 - 11:08 AM  
 
   
 
|   #23 |
cjlin, Thanks for your response.
|
| drpswathi Forum Newbie

Topics: 1 Posts: 16
| | 12/13/07 - 10:46 AM  
 
   
 
|   #24 |
great!!! congratulations doc
|
| Romantic Forum Newbie

Topics: 1 Posts: 12
| | 12/19/07 - 12:19 AM  
 
   
1 of 2 forum leaders found this post helpful  
|   #25 |
Hi CJLIN! Congratz for that High Score>......Thats really commendable! Sir I am in Final Year student and want to take my step after that probably late 2008. Its my dream rather ambition to achieve that high score as u have.....u've rather really on the top with 264/99 as against others' score like 244/99, 245/99 etc. I would request u to guide me rightly thru to that Score. You said u didnt study Kaplan but I've heard others saying they studied only Kaplan and got 99.....plz reply. I am from Pakistan
___________________ Begin a Day with Resolution and End it with Accountability_____THAT'S WHAT I STICK TO
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |