| 05/11/07 - 04:38 PM  
 
   
 
|   #6 |
Luckyall wrote: positive reinf----> when stimuli applied following an operant response,strengthens the probability of that response occuring ! So you mean when introduction of a positive stimulus following a given behaviour results in an increase in the rate of that behaviour. Now in this q the behaviour is "going to the physical therapy session"; what about the positive stimulus?
Edited by virgola82 on 05/11/07 - 04:46 PM
|
| Luckyall Forum Guru
Topics: 11 Posts: 593
| | 05/11/07 - 04:45 PM  
 
   
 
|   #7 |

|
| Luckyall Forum Guru
Topics: 11 Posts: 593
| | 05/11/07 - 04:58 PM  
 
   
 
|   #8 |
he s having pain..... hes going to Phys. Therapy, okay-----> thas the stimuli The response is " the pain lesssens" so he gets wht he wanted-----> therefore this stmuli is a reinforcer bc it increases the probability of a response---> applying the stimuli( going for Therapy) continues the response ( pain lessens), thas how i see it... whas the answer? and the explan. given?
|
| Luckyall Forum Guru
Topics: 11 Posts: 593
| | 05/11/07 - 05:22 PM  
 
   
 
|   #9 |
okay.. is not positive reinf, totally wrong i strongly believe is NEGATIVE REINF. based on the following: Every time when pain comes---> he goes to Phys. therapy--> pain lessens Next time the pain comes---> he goes to phys. ther---> pain lessens The behaviour -------->is going to Phys.Therapy Once the behaviour is done---------> stimulus( PAIN ) -----> goes away Basically the behav continues( going to physioTherapy) to remove the stimuli( PAINNNN) Now im absolutelly & irreversible ON this option NEGATIVE REINF. Virgola, dear, plz let me know , i'll be crying if is not negative reinf. bc i had to look up my notes again 
|
| virgola82 Forum Guru

Topics: 85 Posts: 348
| | 05/12/07 - 02:59 AM  
 
   
 
|   #10 |
You got it! It's negative reinforcement! You don't need to go back on your notes!
|
| lq2006 Forum Elite
Topics: 43 Posts: 382
| | 05/23/07 - 06:34 PM  
 
   
 
|   #11 |
G
|
|
| |
| | | | | | |