Prep for USMLEPrep for USMLE Forum
   Forum    Step 1  Step 2 CK Step 2 CS Step 3  Match  IMGs Resources Search






Previous Topic | Next Topic  2-PREMATCHES from (see the text) 




 
Kaplan Qbank USMLE



Author33 Posts
  #1

i undertake a research study. I want to see how many members, active + silent, read the posts from "match support forum" section.The study has no bias. I am sure that every visitor will open the post and they will do it only one time.

No prematches, only rejections

Thank you for participating in this research, I appreciated

P.S. -You can close now, you did your job.


  #2

smart!!!

  #3

super vai as alwayswink

___________________
Aut Invenam Viam Aut Faciam

  #4

winksmiling face

  #5

this page has 120+ views. somethin which takes other threads over 10days and multiple different users posting to do..

its sad..

___________________
Aut Invenam Viam Aut Faciam

  #6

I clicked to congratulate you!

  #7

this study has a bias
the topic is intentionally given a hot name....2 prematches
unfair


  #8

loser wrote:
this study has a bias
the topic is intentionally given a hot name....2 prematches
unfair


Vai is a good research scietist.He has eliminated bias by letting both males and females participate.By this way all confounding facotors(especially the biggest of them -the female confounding factors ) are ruled out.

When i looked at the topic ,i thought it was a blind dating site.



___________________
WHo let the dogs out in polka dotted dress shirts .

  #9

cool way to kill time: I'm in!

  #10

nice one!



btw, what inference will you draw from this elaborate "mind-play" "psycho-analytic" study??


___________________
The best thing about growing older is that it takes such a long time....

  #11

add this research to ur resume

  #12

Loser! You already posted twice, you are trying to bias my study? You are permitted only one visit. Apurva counts as 5 members, so he is allowed 3 more posts.

  #13

hey vai

isn't this selection bias....

  #14

this is indeep a selection bias and interviewr bias too
u r favoring apurva
bad
this study ends here
p value is more than 0.05


  #15

The protocol was approved by IRB, u 2 (delusion and loser) dont meet the inclusion criteria, i take you out from study. Loser & Delusion are attributes that strongly classify you at exclusion criteria.

Protocol - inclusion criteria: 1) members must be a winner

2) members must believe in reality

3) Moderators counts as 5 junior members.



signed: Vai -principal investigator


  #16



good one


  #17

this is not blind RCT
so not effective


  #18

winkgrincoolsmiling face

___________________
Aut Invenam Viam Aut Faciam

  #19

loser wrote:
this is not blind RCT
so not effective



you are right it is not blind study, actually it is double blind: neither I nor members have any idea about what happen here


  #20

and its prospective. much better than the retrospective.. and double blind prospective rct is the bestestwink

___________________
Aut Invenam Viam Aut Faciam

  #21

I have just heard for AMerican Heart association that this research will go a long way in determining how patients with MI are treated.Those who would start wondering on how this could be possible and that this research is totally irrelavant to heart diseases, need to go back to medicine books .I cant explain the basics here as the forum wouldnt allow me to do it .

Congrats Vai for designing this breakthrough research man.You are a star .Some upcoming tabloids might want to defame you .Its part of the fame .

Loser-you know in a research there are some cases which we cant follow(loss) .And there are some which keep coming back redundantly (gain).Wehav to make up for both losses and gain .The study designed by Vai has taken care of both .What happened to your research about hot girls .you started it and then deleted it .did it not get the approval of ethics comitte or the funding got disapproved.(sorry ,all in good jest ,intentions utterly bonafide)


___________________
WHo let the dogs out in polka dotted dress shirts .

  #22

Vai wrote:
The protocol was approved by IRB, u 2 (delusion and loser) dont meet the inclusion criteria, i take you out from study. Loser & Delusion are attributes that strongly classify you at exclusion criteria.

Protocol - inclusion criteria: 1) members must be a winner

2) members must believe in reality

3) Moderators counts as 5 junior members.



signed: Vai -principal investigator


hey vai

i thought i was trying to eliminate any possible bias in this study... man your inclusion and exclusion criteria seem to be speculative and idea of double blind doesn't agree to me as everybody is aware of what's happening... and this study could be falsely statistically significant if all participants are not treated the same....


  #23

ya laptop i started hot girls

then i thought y the hell am i wasting my time

i have my step 3 on 5dec

sothats y i deleted it


  #24

Made me laugh

  #25

how can double blind pepole...i mean blind in both eyes do a research








You don't have permission to post.




Login or Register to post messages in this topic





















Contact | Leaders | Disclaimer | Privacy

Copyright @ Prep for USMLE. All rights reserved.