| 10/02/06 - 03:40 PM  
 
|   #10 |
sandra wrote: its unlikely to be CLL. CLL is more common in pts over 60 Most probably you are talking with reference to standard textbooks like Harrison etc.But our "forum" believes in "FA". Best of luck
___________________ FA is just a good revision book.It is not a "real" learning tool.
|
| sandra Forum Guru
Topics: 201 Posts: 472
| | 10/02/06 - 04:18 PM  
 
|   #11 |
harrison who reads harrison for mle. atleaSt not me. what does FA say? in kaplan and goljan its mentioned that CLL is more common in people over 60
___________________ You become what you think you are!
|
| drfax Forum Elite

Topics: 26 Posts: 267
| | 10/03/06 - 08:50 AM  
 
|   #12 |
The answer is C. explanation by leopard is ture.
___________________ My best friends are these Gentlemen :Why & How.
|
| Leopard Forum Guru

Topics: 30 Posts: 401
| | 10/03/06 - 12:44 PM  
 
|   #13 |
Thanks drfax I have a question Does FA concept go for CLL ?? Just curious Best of luck
___________________ FA is just a good revision book.It is not a "real" learning tool.
|
| drfax Forum Elite

Topics: 26 Posts: 267
| | 10/03/06 - 09:35 PM  
 
|   #14 |
Leopard, I don't like books like FA really (to be just HY phrases) and I don't do it for pathology especially might be for pharma. or microbiology .. as a source of oreintation. my bible is Robbins pathologic basis of disease 7th. edition, and it doesn't have anything about reduced fat absorption in patients with CLL/SLL GL
___________________ My best friends are these Gentlemen :Why & How.
|
|
| |
| | | | | |