| 09/04/06 - 10:27 AM  
 
|   #11 |
GDS2008 wrote: PPV decreases with increasing sensitivity, but increases with increasing specificity. (due to change in False +ves). I meant specificty in the last post. Coronary angiogram is the msot specific test for CAD. Thanks! Dear Now see this statement contradicts your previous one.If increase in sensitivity decreases the PPV,then angiography being very sensitive should have least PPV and stress tests having decrease sensitivity should have high PPV.(According to your logic) I am not very good on this confusing biostatistics.I feel probably you are referring to screening test diagrams.In which we change the Cut off value and consequently sensitivity and PPV both are affected.But I think our point of discussion is different. What do you say??
|
| GDS2008 Forum Elite
Topics: 9 Posts: 144
| | 09/04/06 - 10:40 AM  
 
|   #12 |
Dear Sea_gull, did I not say in my last post that I meant "specificity" (not sensitivity) in the original post. Coronary angiogram has about 100% specificity but about 70% sensitivity (as many healthy individuals also have some narrowingm which can be seen right from childhood) and therefore it is never used as a screening test. So it is the specificity that I was referring to and with increasing specificty, the PPV aslo increases. I am sorry about the confusion due to my original psot where I wrote sensitivity, when I actually wanted to say specificity. Also, EKG is only 75% SPECIFIC in picking up CAD. Thanks!
|
|
| |
| | |