sunny2 Forum Elite
Topics: 51 Posts: 385
| | 08/13/06 - 12:19 PM  
 
   
 
|   #1 |
42 years old sportsman is involved in a motor vehicle accident, he comes to you with dyspnoea , bruising on the sternum and chest pain. No evidence of sternum fracture and no evidence of rib fracture. you admit him with suspecion of cardiac contusion. The best initial screen test for Cardiac contusion in this particular patient is : 1. CT scan 2. Cardiac enzymes 3. Continuous ECG 4. Blood gas analysis 5. Echocardiogram 6. V/Q scan 7. MRI 8. CT scan with contrast
|
| GDS2008 Forum Elite
Topics: 9 Posts: 144
| | 08/13/06 - 12:24 PM  
 
   
 
|   #2 |
3. Continuous ECG is the answer
|
| frank100 Forum Guru
Topics: 48 Posts: 586
| | 08/13/06 - 07:32 PM  
 
   
 
|   #3 |
yes, they should have and ECG, because sometimes miocardial contusion´s first manifestations are MI-like stuff. and the most sensitive lab study for that is ECG. second thing, in a person with a sternal fracture, pulmonary contusion a BIG one too... my answer is (3)
|
| study_ing Forum Fanatic

Topics: 180 Posts: 2,509
| | 08/13/06 - 07:36 PM  
 
   
 
|   #4 |
i chose 3 for similar resons..in this seting cardiac enzymes arent helpful
___________________ If you yourself are at peace, then there is at least some peace in the world.
|
| icemaiden Forum Elite
Topics: 9 Posts: 117
| | 08/13/06 - 09:57 PM  
 
   
 
|   #5 |
3
|
| juanma0 Forum Senior
Topics: 10 Posts: 146
| | 08/13/06 - 11:00 PM  
 
   
 
|   #6 |
Cardiac contusion = management of MI, so 3 is the answer. Although i am curious if continous is EKG is better than single standard 12 lead EKG.
|
| frank100 Forum Guru
Topics: 48 Posts: 586
| | 08/14/06 - 09:55 AM  
 
   
 
|   #7 |
you´re righ juanma0, continuous ECG have demonstrated to be useless in everyhing, single EKG would be a better option. but the rest of the options are not a good next step.
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | |