| 05/18/06 - 06:21 AM  
 
   
 
|   #9 |
vallia, you went from saying:
vallia wrote: this is a classic aspect of aplastic anemia. to:
vallia wrote: this is myelofibrosis, it's very rare in children i think it's aplastic anemia...is there a reason why you chose myelofibrosis?
|
| DrVirgo Forum Hero

Topics: 1096 Posts: 3,515
| | 05/20/06 - 07:02 PM  
 
   
 
|   #10 |
The answer to MY question is aplastic anemia. The slide the VALIA put is myelofibrosis. (I think thats what valia was trying to say).
___________________ Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall.
|
| docarchana Forum Guru
Topics: 70 Posts: 515
| | 09/01/06 - 05:06 PM  
 
   
 
|   #11 |
u got it right Drvirgo..
|
| fongch Forum Elite

Topics: 71 Posts: 316
| | 10/23/06 - 07:24 PM  
 
   
 
|   #12 |
I vote for myelofibrosis - despite that RBC and WBC counts are both low, the platelet count seems to be OK - if this is aplastic anemia, it should also be low. Also, if I remember correctly, myelofibrosis is caused by expansion of megakaryocyte. Correct me if I am wrong.
|
| ManuNastai
| | 10/25/06 - 07:20 AM  
 
   
 
|   #13 |
it's aplastic anemia @ fongh: the plattelet number is 12.000/mm3 that's a lot less than 150.000/mm3 which is considered the inferior limit of normal..
|
|
| |
| | | | | |