drk1980 Forum Guru

Topics: 147 Posts: 1,038
| | 12/03/05 - 07:47 AM  
 
   
 
|   #3 |
why do u say D?
|
| Believe Forum Senior
Topics: 36 Posts: 93
| | 12/03/05 - 08:30 AM  
 
   
 
|   #4 |
welcome about the brain pics. could you please explain your answers cyra? thanks
___________________ Focus on the one step you can take right now. Let go all regrets and resentment about what has already happened.
|
| mjl1717 Forum Hero

Topics: 956 Posts: 5,452
| | 12/03/05 - 09:53 AM  
 
   
 
|   #5 |
he guessed
___________________ Smell the coffee! "Is That an Osler move??"
|
| roopashri Forum Elite
Topics: 16 Posts: 190
| | 12/03/05 - 12:12 PM  
 
   
 
|   #6 |
i think C. prevalence of the NTD in the population in Q. (remember prevalence goes up, PPV goes up, NPV goes down)
|
| cyra Moderator

Topics: 29 Posts: 844
| | 12/03/05 - 12:59 PM  
 
   
 
|   #7 |
I am sorry...i answered thinking that the question asked about the positive predictive value...for that it would have been the sensitivity...but since the predictive value as a whole is being referred to...i'd agree with roopashri...its C...cos prevalence in part determines the predictive value of a test...
|
| mjl1717 Forum Hero

Topics: 956 Posts: 5,452
| | 12/03/05 - 02:12 PM  
 
   
 
|   #8 |
Briefly: How good is a test at detecting presence or absence of disease-this is sensitivity and specificity respectively.(the abiliy of a test to discover this) {Epidemiologist} Predictive value-the doc or patient wants to know when faced with test results "how likely" it is that a disease is present or absent. Predictive values as stated above vary according to prevalence or underlying probability of disease. Predictive values are not qualities of the test per se bu are a function of the test's characteristics and the setting in which it is being used. As stated above as prev. increaeses PPV increases and NPV decreases. So c is statistically the best answer. Very good q Believe. 
___________________ Smell the coffee! "Is That an Osler move??"
|
| GMOB Forum Elite
Topics: 16 Posts: 230
| | 12/03/05 - 02:42 PM  
 
   
 
|   #9 |
Thanks for this question, i thought D but now i understand why it was wrong!
|
| Believe Forum Senior
Topics: 36 Posts: 93
| | 12/05/05 - 05:46 PM  
 
   
 
|   #10 |
yes, it's a good Q, I would have missed it, thanks for the explainations, I read a little bit more, found in my notes... If Prevalence increaseds:Positive predictive value increases, Negative Predictive value decreases.
Edited by Believe on 12/05/05 - 11:05 PM
___________________ Focus on the one step you can take right now. Let go all regrets and resentment about what has already happened.
|
| Geroo Forum Guru
Topics: 114 Posts: 799
| | 12/05/05 - 10:33 PM  
 
   
 
|   #11 |
If prevalence increases: - sensitivity and specificity don't change - (+PV) increases and (-PV) decreases. however if the sensitivity increases the prevalence will increase because the test will pick up more people with the disease.
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | |