Prep for USMLEPrep for USMLE Forum
   Forum    Step 1  Step 2 CK Step 2 CS Step 3  Match  IMGs Resources Search






Previous Topic | Next Topic  yet another question...of cardio. 




 
Kaplan Qbank USMLE



Author16 Posts
  #1

in case of st elevation MI what is first choice.. thrombolysis or ptca with stent. :roll:

___________________
only strong survive......

  #2

Have to start from thrombolytics, eg...t-PAs and aspirin... etc unless thrombolysis contraindicated, examples....recent ICBleedings, uncontroled HTN, recent trauma, surgery ect.
PTCA with stenting is done after thrombolitics failed, hemodynamicly unstable, CHF, EF<40%, or recurrent ischemia ect....if i am right.

___________________
ELM

  #3

BUT UW SAYS GO FOR PTCA WITH STENT IT S SUPERIOR .. I DUN THINK IT MAKES SENSE COZ IN CASE OF EMERGENCY THROMBOLYTICS R EASY TO GRAB....

___________________
only strong survive......

  #4

Did thet mension any time fram in that question?
what is the best time for thrombolysis in a case of MI?

___________________
Wish best of luck to all users

  #5

i read the same in uw that angioplasty with stenting better than thrombolytics if facilities available?!

  #6

in case of st elevation MI what is first choice.. thrombolysis or ptca with stent.

Dear Noelle - here's a nice algorithm presented to me by a doc from the dept. of cardiovascular medicine at NYH:

MI confirmed:

NEXT step in the management: Consider hemodynamic stability

If hemodynamically stable - NEXT: Are thrombolythics counterindicated?
YES - NEXT: Consider PTCA
NO - NEXT: Consider thrombolythics (especially if within 3-4 hrs of onset)

If hemodynamically unstable - resuscitate first - NEXT: apply the above algorithm.

Simple and effective grin .

Hope it helped.

___________________
the same miky - always ready to help my patients and friends as well

  #7

thanks MIKS!

___________________
only strong survive......

  #8

"mikyro" wrote:
in case of st elevation MI what is first choice.. thrombolysis or ptca with stent.

Dear Noelle - here's a nice algorithm presented to me by a doc from the dept. of cardiovascular medicine at NYH:

MI confirmed:

NEXT step in the management: Consider hemodynamic stability

If hemodynamically stable - NEXT: Are thrombolythics counterindicated?
YES - NEXT: Consider PTCA
NO - NEXT: Consider thrombolythics (especially if within 3-4 hrs of onset)

If hemodynamically unstable - resuscitate first - NEXT: apply the above algorithm.

Simple and effective grin .

Hope it helped.

It is very good algorithm but I am still confused :oops: can any one help me :?:
Let me put my confusion in different case scenarios (keep in mind that no patient had any contraindication to Thrombolysis) :idea:
1. Patient with MI, Hemodynamically stable presented to you about 2 hours of pain.
2. Patient with MI, Hemodynamically stable presented to you about 2 hours of pain.
3. Patient with MI, Hemodynamically unstable presented to you about 5-6 hours of pain
4. Patient with MI, Hemodynamically unstable presented to you about 5-6 hours of pain

What will be your choice for each of these patients?
A. Thrombolysis B. PTCAS with stent

___________________
Wish best of luck to all users

  #9

PTCA FIRST!!! themn thromblys.

___________________
"Life not lived for others, is not worth living" Uncle Einstein
"A life is not important, except in the impact it has on other lives" -Jackie Robinson

  #10

"mdwannabe" wrote:
PTCA FIRST!!! themn thromblys.

For every patient :?: mdwannabe

___________________
Wish best of luck to all users

  #11

It is very good algorithm but I am still confused can any one help me
Let me put my confusion in different case scenarios (keep in mind that no patient had any contraindication to Thrombolysis)

If indeed no CI to thrombolythics - then:

1. Patient with MI, Hemodynamically stable presented to you about 2 hours of pain.

Thromolythis

3. Patient with MI, Hemodynamically unstable presented to you about 5-6 hours of pain

Resuscitate first;
NEXT: PCTA (thrombolysis is an option, but not as affective as PCTA).

If the patient is hemodynamically unstable - it means that an important part of the heart muscle is damaged - for eg: sever LV infarction or LV & RV infarction; the goal is to establish coronary circulation in the damaged vessels as soon as possible to save as much residual heart muscle as possible; otherwise the resuscitative measures will eventually prove ineffective; besides, thrombolythics don't act as fast as PCTA; in either case however you should expect of a more frequent occurrence of reperfusion arrhythmias - I read in a medical book that the more amount of heart muscle is damaged, the more likely the reperfusion arrhythmias to occur.

Hope it helped grin .

___________________
the same miky - always ready to help my patients and friends as well

  #12

Thanks I got it

___________________
Wish best of luck to all users

  #13

as far as I know statiscally/ clinically pts with PTCA do better and have less complications then thrombolytics. So the algorythm is consider PTCA first, if not available or pt unstable to transfer to where it is ... consider thrombolytics.

___________________
"Life not lived for others, is not worth living" Uncle Einstein
"A life is not important, except in the impact it has on other lives" -Jackie Robinson

  #14

i read the same , that if possible do ptca first then thrombolytics if ptca not possible.

  #15

it means if both the option available then there is not role of thrombolytics in acute managment of MI not even in a stable patient within 1 to 2 hour of attack :?:

___________________
Wish best of luck to all users

  #16

go or ptca with or with out stent if available in the set up

if not available go for lytic therapy

ptca more effective than lytic therapy

___________________
hi every one







You don't have permission to post.




Login or Register to post messages in this topic





















Contact | Leaders | Disclaimer | Privacy

Copyright @ Prep for USMLE. All rights reserved.