neurite Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 6
| | 01/26/05 - 07:54 PM  
 
|   #1 |
If the NADPH oxidase of PMN is deficient, should patients become more susceptible to catalase-negative organisms? Why does Kaplan biochemistry on page 202 claim that the patients are more sensitive to catalase-positive organisms? What's the logic here?
|
| phuluong2k Forum Fanatic

Topics: 714 Posts: 2,008
| | 01/27/05 - 02:35 AM  
 
|   #2 |
NADPH oxidase :arrow: O2 :arrow: O2° Superoxide dismutase :arrow: O2° :arrow: H202 Myeloperoxidase :arrow: H202 :arrow: HCLO Catalase positive (staph, ) :arrow: H2O2 :arrow: H20 Staph. produce catalase :arrow: breaks down endogenous hydrogen peroxide :arrow: disrupt the generation of oxygen radicals by a phagocyte oxidase system So catalase is a protective enzyme of Staph. :arrow: most infection in CGD
|
| phuluong2k Forum Fanatic

Topics: 714 Posts: 2,008
| | 01/27/05 - 02:46 AM  
 
|   #3 |
Think that Staph. aureus (catalase positive) is More than dangerous, More toxic, More resistant to drugs than streptococcus (catalase negative) :arrow: More infection in CGD
|
| neurite Forum Newbie
Topics: 2 Posts: 6
| | 01/27/05 - 07:57 AM  
 
|   #4 |
Well, I would think that cat- bacteria are mostly killed by ROS. If no ROS can be produced, these cat- are saved and so become more danderous. Cat+ are bad. But there being no ROS doesn't seem to make them more dangerous. Unless that cat- guys don't play an important role in CGD at all.
|
|
| |
| | | | |