Dan Ivanov
Forum Senior
Topics: 14
Posts: 106
|
Hi, I would like to add a comment about Pathology Review, not Rapid Review (book that I haven't). I think Path Review is better than BRS, more complete, with many corelations with Physio, and more clinical oriented. For more details, pls dont hesitate. Hope this helps.
Dan
___________________
Dan
|
| katzung
Forum Guru
Topics: 74
Posts: 624
|
Basically having used the rapid review by Goljan and having already given the exam i felt rapid review by Goljan to be an excellent book.
If u read this book i think there is no need to listen to goljans lecture audios, basically whatever they test in pathology is given in this book
hope it helps
___________________
Hari Om,Lokaha Samasthaha Sukhino Bhavanthu
(Let All Beings Everywhere Be Happy And Content)
Proud to be an Indian.
|
| daner90007
Forum Newbie
Topics: 6
Posts: 30
|
Your reply is very helpful.
|
| drbilalkhalid
Forum Senior
Topics: 15
Posts: 87
|
which one is the review.
i have one books says systemic kaplan high yeild golian notes.
that has a lot fo tables.
second one i have is 400 pages and the text is in the form of questions.
and then i got pdf fprmat 100 pages listed facts ib points.
wat does the koolgoose audio lecture of golian follow.
thanks ur help willbe much appriciated.
sleepy in new york.
___________________
in the name of allah the beneficient the merciful.
|
| daner90007
Forum Newbie
Topics: 6
Posts: 30
|
I am talking about the published book.
Pathology rapid review by Goljan
I think it is similar to the notes he handed out on his class. So if you don't have the handout, you can buy the book and use it with audio tapes.
|
|
| |
| | | | | |
Similar forum topics