phuluong2k Forum Fanatic

Topics: 714 Posts: 2,008
| | 08/02/04 - 03:13 AM  
 
   
 
|   #1 |
In the beta oxidation of Palmitic Acid, it will produces 106 ATP ( updated value ) 129 ATP ( traditional value ) So Any one can tell that we have to use which value for STEP 1 exam ? Thanks
|
| BumbleB Forum Junior
Topics: 2 Posts: 83
| | 08/03/04 - 07:49 PM  
 
   
 
|   #2 |
I really hope they dont ask this (no offense) unimportant question on the exam but the way I learned it is... palmitic acid = 16 carbons divide by 2 and minus 1 = 7 for each 2 carbons going through beta ox you get 1Fadh2+1nadh+1accoa =(2+3+12)=17 carbons 17 x 7 = 119 add 12 carbons for that extra accoa you get = 131 and subtract 2 for converting palmitate into palmoylcoA = 129 I never learned the "New way"... can you tell me what it is, i heard something about it but I am not sure exactly... btw in beta oxidation the enzymes are fatty acyl coA dehydrogenase = makes fadh2 enoyl coA hydrolase = adds water accross a double bond, doesnt use or make energy 3L hy droxyacyl coA dehydrogenase = makes nadh and beta-ketolase = make accoa ...
|
| mash Forum Fanatic
Topics: 147 Posts: 1,326
| | 08/03/04 - 08:31 PM  
 
   
 
|   #3 |
palmitic acid has 16 C beta oxidation will give 8acetylcoA,7 NADH and 7FADH2 8AcetylCoA will yield--->24 NADH+8FADH2+8GTP(kreb's cycle) 1 NADH yields 3 ATPs 1 FADH2 gives 2 ATPs (7+24)=31NADH; ( 7 + 8 )=15 FADH2;8GTP total ATP=31*3+15*2+8=131 2 ATPs r used to activate palmitate to palmitoyl coA==>net ATP=131-2 =129
___________________ I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. --Confucius
|
| phuluong2k Forum Fanatic

Topics: 714 Posts: 2,008
| | 08/04/04 - 12:28 AM  
 
   
 
|   #4 |
Really i see the updated value of ATP in palmitic acid beta oxidation in ACE Mosby books and on some internet web site C16 give 8 Acetyl CoA 7NADH, 7 FADH2 8 Acetyl CoA give 8 ATP, 24 NADH, 8 FADH2 Totally 31 NADH, 15 FADH2, 8 ATP 31 NADH = 31x 2,5 = 77,5 15FADH2 = 15 x 1,5 = 22,5 so sum = 108 ATP - 2ATP (activating palmitate) = 106 ATP But I think that the classical value of 129 is better .
|
| BumbleB Forum Junior
Topics: 2 Posts: 83
| | 08/04/04 - 05:17 AM  
 
   
 
|   #5 |
as long as you kjnow how to do both, chances are you wont see both answers as choices... the only difference i see is that in the new system fadh2=1.5 not 2 atp and nadh = 3 not 2.5 atp I think the 0.5 atp per nadh or fadh2 is lost somewhere in the ETC in the new calculation ,right?
|
| Malaysian Forum Guru
Topics: 28 Posts: 778
| | 08/11/04 - 06:03 AM  
 
   
 
|   #6 |
will they really ask these sort of questions??
|
|
| |
| | | | | | |