tonguo
Forum Senior
Topics: 29
Posts: 125
|
Could anyone tell me if it is a good resource for Qs? How does its difficulty level correlate to that of the real exam or Kaplan Q-bank? Thanks a lot!
|
| nuprin
Forum Elite
Topics: 16
Posts: 338
|
i only have biochem and physio and in both cases i thought they were useless. wayyyyy too detailed and un-usmle-like. in retrospect, i bet pretest physical diagnosis would have been useful, tho'.
|
| retroviridae
Forum Guru
Topics: 29
Posts: 871
|
questions not representative. Good test of obscure facts, but not worth the effort, IMHO.
|
| tonguo
Forum Senior
Topics: 29
Posts: 125
|
Nuprin and Retroviridae, thanks a lot!
I've been watching your posts recently and know ur both waiting for ur scores. So I wish both of you get great great scores!!
|
| aish
Forum Junior
Topics: 3
Posts: 74
|
The only one worth doing are the pretest "clinical vignettes" mcq's, but it's a book with only 400 q's so you're still better off doing q-bank.
|
|
| |
| | | | | |
