Prep for USMLEPrep for USMLE
         Forum      |     Resources New Posts   |   Register   |   Login





 3strange points in biostatistics  
Get Adobe Flash player



Post Reply  
  • 0/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Author4 Posts
  #1

I am sorry but i am writing here because no epidemiology category

q1
in is pg of boistatistics chapter in Kaplan psychiatric note book
if the event r nonindependent.....e,g if one has a box with 5 white & 5 blacks balls in it,the chance of picking two blacks balls is (5/10)x(4/9)=0.5x0.44=0.22(or 22%)
can u plz explain from where that equation comes from !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


q2 in Kaplan epidemiology video when he explain the equation if fat=30% &DN=10%
calculate the chance of meet fat or DM or both he said (A+B)-(AxB)
BUT if ask chance of meet fat or DM not both he said (A+B)-2AB BUT i think the equation should be (A+B)-2(A/B) correct me if I am wrong

q3 can u explain the answer of the last q (q6 ) in Kaplan note 2008-2009
which is article with tabular data of relative risk of DM the answer was c
which is :Level 3 and 4 are significantly different from baseline and risk elevation>
why not a,b,d,e
again I am sorry but iam writing here because no epidemiology category






  #2

is this for step 2 ?


  #3

yes, step 2
from kaplan note of psychatric & epidemiology2008-2009
in chapter 2 biostatistic page:141
combine propapility
in is pg of boistatistics chapter in Kaplan psychiatric note book
if the event r nonindependent.....e,g if one has a box with 5 white & 5 blacks balls in it,the chance of picking two blacks balls is (5/10)x(4/9)=0.5x0.44=0.22(or 22%)
can u plz explain from where that equation comes from !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in biostatistic page:155 the last q
can u explain the answer of the last q (q6 ) in Kaplan note 2008-2009
which is article with tabular data of relative risk of DM the answer was c
which is :Level 3 and 4 are significantly different from baseline and risk elevation>
why not a,b,d,e
again I am sorry but iam writing here because no epidemiology category


nod the whole note is easy except those


  #4

omg i hate math, i thought i was done with this stuff grin .. anyways have no idea and dnt have the kaplan books but

what i remember from step 1 is that for non-independent ( dependent ) event u assume that one has already occured. so if there were 10 balls 5 white and 5 black the chance of u picked black is 5/10 but if u picked one already and one to pick again so 4/9 and the chance of white still is 5/10 since u can still pick those. they basically depend on each other thats the main thing.

the other thing i just look at my old f.a book for step 1 and i have a+b - 2(axb) ..

i dnt think it can be division because when u divide fractions they actually increase like .30/.10 = 3 vs .30 x .10 = .03 i mean the chance of finding someone with both and not both should be harder than finding with one thing. i dnt know if that makes sense. but anyways good luck man





Bookmark and Share





Login or Register to post messages








show Similar forum topics

Imp points GI
Points
Cut off points...
show Related resources

NMS Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Preventive Medicine
Appleton and Lange's Review of Epidemiology and Biostatistics








Advertise | Support | Privacy | TOS | Premium | Contact